Iridient x-transformer vs silkypix
So now you have DNG files that limit what applications you can use. Most applications provide only partial support if any, there are exceptions but they are limited.
#IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER VS SILKYPIX FULL#
Why would you want to? Only Adobe provides full support for DNG files. On1 is certainly trying hard to provide a complete package and the competition should benefit everyone, but I'm just not ready to get behind On1.Ĭlick to expand.You might reconsider deleting your raw files as once you delete them there is no going back. The simplest solution is to go to Capture One but the least expensive solution may be to develop some presets that give you the look you are wanting. Unfortunately DxO PhotoLab does not support the X-Trans sensors at all, so DxO is not an option.
To me, DxO often does a better raw conversion than Adobe. I think Capture One should be commended for the great job in setting up their presets for Fuji, but I'm not convinced that Lightroom (or ACR) could not produce the same by editing the presets. It seems to my eye, given the quality of the images I can see in the video, the main difference between the Lightroom image and the Capture One image seems to be that Capture One applies a mid-tone contrast where Lightroom does not. But to say that no editing occurred is ignoring the presets that each software starts off with. I agree that Capture One presents a much nicer image than Lightroom.